|  | 
      Archived from 
      Charlotte Gerson's booklet 
       
      Story 
         In 
      October of 1990, in his 58th year, David was diagnosed withkidney cancer that had spread to both kidneys. He had originally
 gone to his urologist because an enlarged prostate was causing some
 problems with urination. While being initially treated for this condition,
 he was also given an LV.P. (Intravenous Pyelogram) test for
 visualizing kidneys. This test revealed "a depression, like something
 was pressing on his kidney." To check further, a CAT scan was done.
 Nothing showed outside of his kidneys. However multiple tumors
 were visible in both kidneys: five or six in the right kidney, and three
 in the left. A needle biopsy done on the largest tumor tested positive
 for a fast-moving malignancy.
 
 The doctor told David that the tumors could not be removed
 because they were too close to the major blood supply to the kidneys.
 "This is the worst possible scenario I can imagine," he said, and
 proposed a swift entire removal of both kidneys. This operation of
 course would have required David to receive regular dialysis for the
 rest of his life. When David refused to undergo this surgery, another
 doctor sent him to UCLA to see about entering an experimental
 program using interferon. However, the UCLA oncologist wouldn't
 allow David to participate in this trial. There was a chance, he
 declared, that David's cancerous condition was "curable" if both his
 kidneys were removed.
 
 At this point, David was sent back to his surgeon/urologist for the
 dual nephrectomy. When David asked about the possibility of
 receiving a kidney transplant, he was told that this would be impossible.
 The immunosuppressive drugs he would have to take to prevent
 his body from rejecting the donated kidney almost certainly would
 cause his cancer to recur. David was also informed that if he
 attempted to try some nutritional treatment first, which he was now
 considering doing, it probably would be too late to do surgery since
 the cancer doubtless would spread. Nevertheless, David again refused
 to have his kidneys removed.
 
 Instead, in January of 1991, David came to the Gerson Therapy
 hospital in Mexico. After checking in, his first urinalysis, showed a
 slight amount of blood in his urine. None showed in any of his
 subsequent tests.
 
 When returning home after some three weeks, David maintained
 the strict therapy for two years, and then continued on a less intensive
 treatment. Six years later, his regimen was reduced to four carrot
 juices and one green juice daily, and a coffee enema every other day.
 He still does the castor oil treatment every other month.
 
 Since kidney cancer tends to spread to the lungs, some months ago
 David had lung X-rays taken; his lungs showed clear. He has blood
 tests and urinalyses done regularly. David reported that his doctor
 commented, "I never see blood tests this good, they are better than
 my own."
 
 Surprisingly, tumors still show in David's kidneys when they are
 scanned. At the time of his diagnosis and biopsy, in 1990, these were
 described as fast-growing malignancies. But since the tumors remain
 unchanged and no other cancer has appeared in his body for the past
 11 years, it is fairly safe to assume that the tumors are either calcified
 and virtually dead, or else encapsulated. If they were active, they
 would be growing and/or spreading.
 
 Last report: October 2001. At that time, David Saracoff was close
 to his 69th birthday. He was currently in good health, had fair energy,
 his weight was steady, his appetite and sleep normal. He was pain free.
 "I am fairly active," he said. "I bought a motor home and took a
 trip back East for seven weeks. And I also went camping."
 
 
  
 |  |